From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:21:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] populated_map: fix !NUMA case, remove comment In-Reply-To: <20070612032055.GQ3798@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20070611225213.GB14458@us.ibm.com> <20070611234155.GG14458@us.ibm.com> <20070612000705.GH14458@us.ibm.com> <20070612020257.GF3798@us.ibm.com> <20070612023209.GJ3798@us.ibm.com> <20070612032055.GQ3798@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, anton@samba.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > I am not sure what you are up to. Just make sure that the changes are > > minimal. Look in the source code for other examples on how !NUMA > > situations were handled. > > I swear I'm trying to make the code do the right thing, and understand > the NUMA intricacies better. Sorry for the flood of e-mails and such. I > asked about specific other cases because they are used in !NUMA > situations too and I wasn't sure why node_populated_map should be > different. > > But ok, I will rely on the source to be correct and make my changelog > indicate where I got the ideas from. Ok. I just hope this crash course in Linux NUMA is useful and you keep on working on NUMA.... -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org