From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:20:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] populated_map: fix !NUMA case, remove comment In-Reply-To: <20070612020257.GF3798@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20070611202728.GD9920@us.ibm.com> <20070611221036.GA14458@us.ibm.com> <20070611225213.GB14458@us.ibm.com> <20070611234155.GG14458@us.ibm.com> <20070612000705.GH14458@us.ibm.com> <20070612020257.GF3798@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, anton@samba.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > [PATCH v6][RFC] Fix hugetlb pool allocation with empty nodes There is no point in compiling the interleave logic for !NUMA. There needs to be some sort of !NUMA fallback in hugetlb. It would be better to call a interleave function in mempolicy.c that provides an appropriate shim for !NUMA. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org