From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:42:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][RFC] Fix INTERLEAVE with memoryless nodes In-Reply-To: <20070612001436.GI14458@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20070611202728.GD9920@us.ibm.com> <20070611221036.GA14458@us.ibm.com> <20070611225213.GB14458@us.ibm.com> <20070611230829.GC14458@us.ibm.com> <20070612001436.GI14458@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, anton@samba.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Well, if the only place to get a "new" policy is mpol_new(), no, as just > after the above nodes_and(), we check the weight of the nodemask. Is > that sufficient? Yes. That is good. Acked-by: Christoph Lameter -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org