From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 22:28:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] slob: rework freelist handling In-Reply-To: <20070523052206.GD29045@wotan.suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20070522145345.GN11115@waste.org> <20070523030637.GC9255@wotan.suse.de> <20070523045938.GA29045@wotan.suse.de> <20070523050333.GB29045@wotan.suse.de> <20070523051152.GC29045@wotan.suse.de> <20070523052206.GD29045@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nick Piggin Cc: Matt Mackall , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List List-ID: On Wed, 23 May 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > > This is intended for distro kernels so that you will not have to rebuild > > the kernel for slab debugging if slab corruption occurs. > > OIC, neat. Anyway, the code size issue is still there, so I will > test with the fix instead. A code size issue? You mean SLUB is code wise larger than SLOB? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org