From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@google.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 10:59:30 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705171057110.18085@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1179424335.2925.5.camel@lappy>
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I am weirdly confused by these patches. Among other things you told me
> > that the performance does not matter since its never (or rarely) being
> > used (why do it then?).
>
> When we are very low on memory and do access the reserves by means of
> ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS, we want to avoid processed that are not entitled to
> use such memory from running away with the little we have.
For me low memory conditions are node or zone specific and may be
particular to certain allocation constraints. For some reason you have
this simplified global picture in mind.
The other statement is weird. It is bad to fail allocation attempts, they
may lead to a process being terminated. Memory should be reclaimed
earlier to avoid these situations.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-17 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-14 13:19 Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 13:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm: page allocation rank Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 13:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: slab allocation fairness Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 15:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 13:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: slub " Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 15:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 16:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 13:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: slob " Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 13:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: allow mempool to fall back to memalloc reserves Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 15:53 ` [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 16:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 16:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 16:12 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-14 16:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 17:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 19:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 19:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 20:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 20:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 20:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 20:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-15 17:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-15 22:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 6:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 18:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 19:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 19:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 20:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 20:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 20:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 20:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 20:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 20:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 21:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 21:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 21:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-16 21:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 7:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 17:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 18:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 19:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 20:01 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-14 20:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 3:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 7:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 17:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 17:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 17:59 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2007-05-17 17:53 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-17 18:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 19:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 21:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-17 21:44 ` Paul Jackson
2007-05-17 22:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-18 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-18 17:11 ` Paul Jackson
2007-05-18 17:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-20 8:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-21 16:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 19:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-21 19:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 20:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-21 20:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-21 20:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-21 21:04 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0705171057110.18085@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=phillips@google.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox