From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:16:09 +0100 (IST) From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Have kswapd keep a minimum order free other than order-0 In-Reply-To: <1179218576.25205.1.camel@rousalka.dyndns.org> Message-ID: References: <20070514173218.6787.56089.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> <20070514173238.6787.57003.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> <20070514182456.GA9006@skynet.ie> <1179218576.25205.1.camel@rousalka.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="29444707-1445859050-1179219542=:6896" Content-ID: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nicolas Mailhot Cc: Christoph Lameter , Andy Whitcroft , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linux Memory Management List List-ID: --29444707-1445859050-1179219542=:6896 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=X-UNKNOWN; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-ID: On Tue, 15 May 2007, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le lundi 14 mai 2007 =C3=A0 19:24 +0100, Mel Gorman a =C3=A9crit : >> On (14/05/07 11:13), Christoph Lameter didst pronounce: >>> I think the slub fragment may have to be this way? This calls >>> raise_kswapd_order on each kmem_cache_create with the order of the cach= e >>> that was created thus insuring that the min_order is correctly. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter >>> >> >> Good plan. Revised patch as follows; > > Kernel with this patch and the other one survives testing. I'll stop > heavy testing now and consider the issue closed. > That is good news, thanks for the report. > Thanks for looking at my bug report. > Thank you very much for your testing. I know it was a lot to ask to tie a= =20 machine up for a few days. --=20 Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab --29444707-1445859050-1179219542=:6896-- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org