On Tue, 15 May 2007, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

> Le lundi 14 mai 2007 à 19:24 +0100, Mel Gorman a écrit :
>> On (14/05/07 11:13), Christoph Lameter didst pronounce:
>>> I think the slub fragment may have to be this way? This calls
>>> raise_kswapd_order on each kmem_cache_create with the order of the cache
>>> that was created thus insuring that the min_order is correctly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
>>>
>>
>> Good plan. Revised patch as follows;
>
> Kernel with this patch and the other one survives testing. I'll stop
> heavy testing now and consider the issue closed.
>

That is good news, thanks for the report.

> Thanks for looking at my bug report.
>

Thank you very much for your testing. I know it was a lot to ask to tie a 
machine up for a few days.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab