linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: apw@shadowen.org, nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Have kswapd keep a minimum order free other than order-0
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:01:43 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705141058590.11319@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070514173238.6787.57003.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie>

On Mon, 14 May 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:

> +++ linux-2.6.21-mm2-001_kswapd_minorder/mm/slub.c	2007-05-14 17:09:39.000000000 +0100
> @@ -2131,6 +2131,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_caches
>  static int __init setup_slub_min_order(char *str)
>  {
>  	get_option (&str, &slub_min_order);
> +	raise_kswapd_order(slub_min_order);
>  	user_override = 1;
>  	return 1;
>  }

You need to do this for slub_max_order not for slub_min_order. Also the
slub_max_order may not necessarily be used. It is just the maximum allowed 
order. I could maintain a slub_max_used_order variable. When that is 
increased I could call raise_kswapd_order?

The same call needs to be put into kmem_cache_init? Or is this only for 
orders > 3?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-14 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-14 17:32 [PATCH 0/2] Two patches to address bug report in relation to high-order atomic allocations Mel Gorman
2007-05-14 17:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] Have kswapd keep a minimum order free other than order-0 Mel Gorman
2007-05-14 18:01   ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2007-05-14 18:13     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 18:24       ` Mel Gorman
2007-05-14 18:52         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-15  8:42         ` Nicolas Mailhot
2007-05-15  9:16           ` Mel Gorman
2007-05-16  8:25             ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-16  9:03               ` Mel Gorman
2007-05-16  9:10                 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-16  9:45                   ` Mel Gorman
2007-05-16 12:28                     ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-16 13:50                       ` Mel Gorman
2007-05-16 14:04                         ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-16 15:32                           ` Mel Gorman
2007-05-16 15:44                             ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-16 16:46                               ` Mel Gorman
2007-05-17  7:09                                 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-17 12:22                                   ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-05-18  2:25                                     ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-16 15:46                             ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-16 14:20                         ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-16 15:06                           ` Nicolas Mailhot
2007-05-16 15:33                             ` Mel Gorman
2007-05-15 17:09           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-15  4:39       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 18:19     ` Mel Gorman
2007-05-14 17:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] Only check absolute watermarks for ALLOC_HIGH and ALLOC_HARDER allocations Mel Gorman
2007-05-16 12:14   ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-16 13:24     ` Mel Gorman
2007-05-16 13:35       ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-16 14:00         ` Mel Gorman
2007-05-16 14:11           ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-16 18:28             ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-05-16 18:48               ` Mel Gorman
2007-05-16 19:00                 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17  7:34               ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-14 18:13 ` [PATCH 0/2] Two patches to address bug report in relation to high-order atomic allocations Nicolas Mailhot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0705141058590.11319@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox