From: Esben Nielsen <nielsen.esben@googlemail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Esben Nielsen <nielsen.esben@googlemail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] convert mmap_sem to a scalable rw_mutex
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 15:44:19 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705121520210.2101@frodo.shire> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178964103.6810.55.camel@twins>
On Sat, 12 May 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 11:27 +0200, Esben Nielsen wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 11 May 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I was toying with a scalable rw_mutex and found that it gives ~10% reduction in
>>> system time on ebizzy runs (without the MADV_FREE patch).
>>>
>>
>> You break priority enheritance on user space futexes! :-(
>> The problems is that the futex waiter have to take the mmap_sem. And as
>> your rw_mutex isn't PI enabled you get priority inversions :-(
>
> Do note that rwsems have no PI either.
> PI is not a concern for mainline - yet, I do have ideas here though.
>
>
If PI wasn't a concern for mainline, why is PI futexes merged into the
mainline?
I notice that the rwsems used now isn't priority inversion safe (thus
destroyingthe perpose of having PI futexes). We thus already have a bug in
the mainline.
I suggest making a rw_mutex which does read side PI: A reader boosts the
writer, but a writer can't boost the readers, since there can be a large
amount of those.
I don't have time to make such a rw_mutex but I have a simple idea for
one, where the rt_mutex can be reused.
struct pi_rw_mutex {
int count; /* 0 -> unoccupied,
>0 -> the number of current readers,
Second highest bit: there are a waiting writer
-1 -> A writer have it. */
struct rt_mutex mutex;
}
Use atomic exchange on count.
When locking:
A writer checks if count <= 0. If so it sets the value to -1 and takes
the mutex. When it gets the mutex it rechecks the count and proceeds.
If count > 0 the writer sets the second highest bit and add itself to
the wait-list in the mutex and sleeps. (The mutex will now be in a state
where owner==NULL but there are waiters. It must be cheched if the
rt_mutex code can handle this.)
A reader checks if count >= 0. If so it does count++ and proceeds.
If count < 0 it takes the rtmutex. When it gets the mutex it sets the
count to 1, unlocks the mutex and proceeds.
When unlocking:
The writer sets count to 0 or 0x8000000 (second highest bit) depending
on how many waiters the mutex have and unlocks the mutex.
The reader checks if count is 0x80000001. If so it sets count to 0 and
wakes up the first waiter on the mutex (if there are any). Otherwise it
just do count--.
Esben
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-12 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-11 13:15 Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 14:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-11 16:31 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-11 17:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-11 18:05 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12 18:55 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-12 18:06 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12 18:11 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16 23:28 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16 23:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-17 0:24 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-12 18:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-12 19:21 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-12 21:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-11 17:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 23:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-12 7:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-12 13:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-12 16:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-12 16:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-12 18:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-05-14 10:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 11:36 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-15 0:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-05-15 7:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-15 15:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-05-15 16:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-15 18:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-05-11 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: change mmap_sem over to the " Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 16:17 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-11 17:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 18:08 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-14 11:54 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-11 15:56 ` [PATCH 0/2] convert mmap_sem to a " Ingo Molnar
2007-05-11 16:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-11 17:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-14 12:07 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-14 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-11 17:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-14 11:58 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-14 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-12 9:27 ` Esben Nielsen
2007-05-12 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-12 13:44 ` Esben Nielsen [this message]
2007-05-12 14:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-12 15:34 ` Esben Nielsen
2007-05-12 15:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-12 15:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-14 8:50 ` Esben Nielsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0705121520210.2101@frodo.shire \
--to=nielsen.esben@googlemail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox