From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>,
"Wang, Peter Xihong" <peter.xihong.wang@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: RE: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 15:02:51 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705081502130.15135@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178658124.15701.35.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Tim Chen wrote:
> I tried the slub-patches and the avoid atomic overhead patch against
> 2.6.21-mm1. It brings the TCP_STREAM performance for SLUB to the SLAB
> level. The patches not mentioned in the "series" file did not apply
> cleanly to 2.6.21-mm1 and I skipped most of those.
Ahhh. Great. The patches not mentioned should not be applied corredct.
> Without skip atomic overhead patch, the throughput drops by 1 to 1.5%.
>
> The change from slub_min_order=0 slub_max_order=4
> to slub_min_order=6 slub_max_order=7 did not make much difference in
> my tests.
Allright. I will then put that patch in.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-08 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-02 18:43 Tim Chen
2007-05-02 19:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-03 23:28 ` Chen, Tim C
2007-05-04 0:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 1:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 23:41 ` Tim Chen
2007-05-05 1:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-08 0:40 ` Tim Chen
2007-05-08 1:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-08 21:02 ` Tim Chen
2007-05-08 22:02 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2007-05-08 4:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 2:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 17:14 ` Tim Chen
2007-05-04 18:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 17:39 ` Tim Chen
2007-05-04 18:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 22:43 ` Tim Chen
2007-05-04 23:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-04 23:42 ` Tim Chen
2007-05-05 1:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-05 2:05 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0705081502130.15135@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peter.xihong.wang@intel.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox