From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 08:43:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] SLUB: slab_ops instead of constructors / destructors In-Reply-To: <84144f020705050314s36510c98j70d1ca8e3770f00e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20070504221555.642061626@sgi.com> <20070504221708.363027097@sgi.com> <84144f020705050314s36510c98j70d1ca8e3770f00e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Pekka Enberg Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dgc@sgi.com, Eric Dumazet , Mel Gorman List-ID: On Sat, 5 May 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote: > For consistency with other operations structures, can we make this > struct kmem_cache_operations or kmem_cache_ops, please? Ok. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org