From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 08:42:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] SLUB: Implement targeted reclaim and partial list defragmentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20070504221555.642061626@sgi.com> <20070504221708.596112123@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, dgc@sgi.com, Eric Dumazet , Mel Gorman List-ID: On Sat, 5 May 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: > clameter@sgi.com writes: > > > > NOTE: This patch is for conceptual review. I'd appreciate any feedback > > especially on the locking approach taken here. It will be critical to > > resolve the locking issue for this approach to become feasable. > > Do you have any numbers on how this improves dcache reclaim under memory pressure? How does one measure something like that? I wanted to first make sure that the thing is sane. If there is a gaping race here then I may have to add more code to cover that. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org