From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 13:14:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub In-Reply-To: <20070502195412.GC9044@uranus.ravnborg.org> Message-ID: References: <20070430162007.ad46e153.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070501125559.9ab42896.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070501133618.93793687.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070502121105.de3433d5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070502195412.GC9044@uranus.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, 2 May 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > To facilitate this do NOT introduce CONFIG_SLAB until we decide > that SLUB are default. In this way we can make CONFIG_SLUB be default > and people will not continue with CONFIG_SLAB because they had it in their > config already. We already have CONFIG_SLAB. If you use your existing .config then you will stay with SLAB. > The point is make sure that LSUB becomes default for people that does > an make oldconfig (explicit or implicit). Hmmmm... We can think about that when we actually want to make SLUB the default. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org