Re: slab allocators: Remove multiple alignment specifications.

[Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>]

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > Sorry. Trees overloaded with series of patches. Any change to get 
> > a new tree?
> 
> rofl.
> 
> I'm still recovering from that dang Itanium conference.  Since rc6-mm1 I
> have added 684 patches and removed 164.  It's simply idiotic.
> 
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/cl.bz2 is the current rollup against rc7. 
> I haven't tried compiling it for nearly a week.  Good luck ;)

Well xpmem is broke and readahead is failing all over the place. Some 
patches missing?

Hmmmm... Revoke.c has another copy of these fs constructor flag checks 
that I fixed earlier.

Index: linux-2.6.21-rc7/fs/revoke.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.21-rc7.orig/fs/revoke.c	2007-04-20 23:30:11.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc7/fs/revoke.c	2007-04-20 23:30:33.000000000 -0700
@@ -709,8 +709,7 @@ static void revokefs_init_inode(void *ob
 {
 	struct revokefs_inode_info *info = obj;
 
-	if ((flags & (SLAB_CTOR_VERIFY | SLAB_CTOR_CONSTRUCTOR)) ==
-	    SLAB_CTOR_CONSTRUCTOR) {
+	if (flags & SLAB_CTOR_CONSTRUCTOR) {
 		info->owner = NULL;
 		inode_init_once(&info->vfs_inode);
 	}

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>