From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:17:19 +0300 (EEST) From: Pekka J Enberg Subject: Re: [PATCH] Show slab memory usage on OOM and SysRq-M In-Reply-To: <20070417171213.e3cbc260.dada1@cosmosbay.com> Message-ID: References: <4624C3C1.9040709@sw.ru> <84144f020704170622h2b16f0f6m47ffdbb3b5686758@mail.gmail.com> <20070417171213.e3cbc260.dada1@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Pavel Emelianov , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , devel@openvz.org, Kirill Korotaev , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote: > This nr_pages should be in struct kmem_list3, not in struct kmem_cache, > or else you defeat NUMA optimizations if touching a field in kmem_cache > at kmem_getpages()/kmem_freepages() time. We already touch ->flags, ->gfpflags, and ->gfporder in kmem_getpages(). Sorry for my ignorance, but how is this different? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org