linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86_64: Switch to SPARSE_VIRTUAL
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:18:16 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704020914280.30634@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704011246.52238.ak@suse.de>

On Sun, 1 Apr 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Or do you have overlaps with other memory (I think you have)

We may get into a case where some page structs are physically located
on other nodes if there are no holes between nodes. This would be 
particularly significant for 64MB node sizes using numa emulation.
But there it really does not matter where the real memory is located.
(this is really inherent in sparsemems way of mapping memory).

> In that case you have to handle the overlap in change_page_attr()

Why would we use change_page_attr on page structs? I can see that the 
pages themselves should be subject to change_page_attr but why the 
page_structs? I think the system would panic if one would set page structs 
to read only.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-04-02 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-01  7:10 [PATCH 1/2] Generic Virtual Memmap suport for SPARSEMEM Christoph Lameter
2007-04-01  7:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86_64: Switch to SPARSE_VIRTUAL Christoph Lameter
2007-04-01  7:11   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-01 10:46   ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-02 15:37     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-02 15:44       ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-02 15:51         ` Martin J. Bligh
2007-04-02 15:54         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-02 17:14           ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-02 17:34             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-02 19:54           ` Dave Hansen
2007-04-02 20:11             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-02 20:13       ` Dave Hansen
2007-04-02 20:30         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-02 20:38           ` Martin Bligh
2007-04-02 20:51             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-05 11:50               ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-04-05 18:27                 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-07 22:06                   ` [PATCH 1/4] x86_64: (SPARSE_VIRTUAL doubles sparsemem speed) Christoph Lameter
2007-04-07 22:18                     ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-09 16:40                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-09 17:16                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-09 18:20                         ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-02 21:08           ` [PATCH 1/4] x86_64: Switch to SPARSE_VIRTUAL Dave Hansen
2007-04-02 21:28             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-02 21:43               ` Martin Bligh
2007-04-02 21:56               ` Dave Hansen
2007-04-02 22:29                 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-02 22:31                 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-02 22:37                   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-02 22:41                     ` Martin Bligh
2007-04-02 22:49                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-02 22:52                         ` Martin Bligh
2007-04-05 12:07                   ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-04-04 21:27               ` Bob Picco
2007-04-04 22:38                 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-02 23:03       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-04-02 15:44     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-02 16:18     ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2007-04-02 20:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] Generic Virtual Memmap suport for SPARSEMEM Dave Hansen
2007-04-02 21:00   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-02 21:22     ` Dave Hansen
2007-04-02 21:31       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-02 21:42         ` Dave Hansen
2007-04-02 21:53           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-02 22:05             ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0704020914280.30634@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox