From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [patch] mm: fix xip issue with /dev/zero
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:07:53 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703271748010.29398@blonde.wat.veritas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1175009868.8401.8.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Carsten Otte wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2007, 18:59 +0000 schrieb Hugh Dickins:
> > Still not quite right, so I took your patch and reworked it below:
> > if you agree with that version, please send it on to akpm.
> Sorry for my late reply.
I am the last person anyone should apologize to for lateness!
> The patch does'nt apply on -mm anymore, because
> filemap_xip now uses fault instead of nopage. I modified your patch
> again to fit on current -mm. Did I miss something? If no, I will send it
> to Andrew. I've done some basic testing on it, all seems to work well.
Comparing against what I suggested, it looks just right to me:
do go ahead and send Andrew.
But that comparison does show one discrepancy, not in your patch
below, but where Nick and I independently fixed up the "error
reporting". He interprets one failure of get_xip_page as
VM_FAULT_OOM then the next as VM_FAULT_SIGBUS, where I thought
them both NOPAGE_SIGBUS.
I'm inclined to agree with me on that, though it's hard to tell
without peering into the internals of ->get_xip_page()s.
Hmm, and in looking into that, the whole file seems quite confused
as to whether ->get_xip_page might return NULL page or not: some
places allow for it (one treating it as -EIO, another as -ENOMEM),
others don't allow for it at all. Something to tidy up.
Hugh
>
> This patch fixes the bug, that reading into xip mapping from /dev/zero
> fills the user page table with ZERO_PAGE() entries. Later on, xip cannot
> tell which pages have been ZERO_PAGE() filled by access to a sparse
> mapping, and which ones origin from /dev/zero. It will unmap ZERO_PAGE
> from all mappings when filling the sparse hole with data.
> xip does now use its own zeroed page for its sparse mappings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm2/mm/filemap_xip.c 2007-03-27 12:51:22.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5-mm2+patch/mm/filemap_xip.c 2007-03-27 15:37:44.000000000 +0200
> @@ -17,6 +17,29 @@
> #include "filemap.h"
>
> /*
> + * We do use our own empty page to avoid interference with other users
> + * of ZERO_PAGE(), such as /dev/zero
> + */
> +static struct page *__xip_sparse_page;
> +
> +static struct page *xip_sparse_page(void)
> +{
> + if (!__xip_sparse_page) {
> + unsigned long zeroes = get_zeroed_page(GFP_HIGHUSER);
> + if (zeroes) {
> + static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(xip_alloc_lock);
> + spin_lock(&xip_alloc_lock);
> + if (!__xip_sparse_page)
> + __xip_sparse_page = virt_to_page(zeroes);
> + else
> + free_page(zeroes);
> + spin_unlock(&xip_alloc_lock);
> + }
> + }
> + return __xip_sparse_page;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * This is a file read routine for execute in place files, and uses
> * the mapping->a_ops->get_xip_page() function for the actual low-level
> * stuff.
> @@ -162,7 +185,7 @@
> * xip_write
> *
> * This function walks all vmas of the address_space and unmaps the
> - * ZERO_PAGE when found at pgoff. Should it go in rmap.c?
> + * __xip_sparse_page when found at pgoff.
> */
> static void
> __xip_unmap (struct address_space * mapping,
> @@ -177,13 +200,16 @@
> spinlock_t *ptl;
> struct page *page;
>
> + page = __xip_sparse_page;
> + if (!page)
> + return;
> +
> spin_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_lock);
> vma_prio_tree_foreach(vma, &iter, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, pgoff) {
> mm = vma->vm_mm;
> address = vma->vm_start +
> ((pgoff - vma->vm_pgoff) << PAGE_SHIFT);
> BUG_ON(address < vma->vm_start || address >= vma->vm_end);
> - page = ZERO_PAGE(0);
> pte = page_check_address(page, mm, address, &ptl);
> if (pte) {
> /* Nuke the page table entry. */
> @@ -245,8 +271,12 @@
> /* unmap page at pgoff from all other vmas */
> __xip_unmap(mapping, fdata->pgoff);
> } else {
> - /* not shared and writable, use ZERO_PAGE() */
> - page = ZERO_PAGE(0);
> + /* not shared and writable, use xip_sparse_page() */
> + page = xip_sparse_page();
> + if (!page) {
> + fdata->type = VM_FAULT_OOM;
> + return NULL;
> + }
> }
>
> out:
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-27 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-16 12:22 Carsten Otte
2007-02-18 18:56 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-02-26 18:04 ` [RFC] " Carsten Otte
2007-03-01 18:59 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-03-27 15:37 ` Carsten Otte
2007-03-27 17:07 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0703271748010.29398@blonde.wat.veritas.com \
--to=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox