From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@lazybastard.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:14:48 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702241613520.4891@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070224193322.GA17276@lazybastard.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 332 bytes --]
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Jörn Engel wrote:
> How much of a gain is the merging anyway? Once you start having
> explicit whitelists or blacklists of pools that can be merged, one can
> start to wonder if the result is worth the effort.
It eliminates 50% of the slab caches. Thus it reduces the management
overhead by half.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-25 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-22 7:00 Christoph Lameter
2007-02-22 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-02-22 15:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-22 8:58 ` David Miller, Christoph Lameter
2007-02-22 15:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-22 10:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-02-22 15:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-22 17:54 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-22 18:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-23 0:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-23 4:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-24 5:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-02-24 5:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-24 5:54 ` David Miller, Christoph Lameter
2007-02-24 17:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-24 19:33 ` Jörn Engel
2007-02-25 0:14 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2007-02-25 12:23 ` Jörn Engel
2007-02-25 0:53 ` David Miller, Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0702241613520.4891@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=joern@lazybastard.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox