From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:03:13 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] concurrent pagecache (against 2.6.19-rt) In-Reply-To: <20061207161800.426936000@chello.nl> Message-ID: References: <20061207161800.426936000@chello.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin List-ID: On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Based on Nick's lockless (read-side) pagecache patches (included in the series) > here an attempt to make the write side concurrent. On first glance it looks quite interesting and very innovative. Removing the tree_lock completely also reduces cache line usage. The page struct cacheline is already references in most contexts. > Comment away ;-) Could you post Nick's patches from your email addres and add a From Nick line in them? Its a bit confusing to have a patchset with different originating email addresses. Or does this come about by the evil header mangling of the list processor? Maybe you need to use >From ?? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org