From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:23:13 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] vmemmap on sparsemem v2 In-Reply-To: <20061210151931.GB28442@osiris.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20061205214517.5ad924f6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <457C0D86.70603@shadowen.org> <20061210151931.GB28442@osiris.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Heiko Carstens Cc: Andy Whitcroft , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Linux-MM , Martin Schwidefsky List-ID: On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, Heiko Carstens wrote: > Hmm.. this implementation still requires sparsemem. Maybe it would be > possible to implement a generic vmem_map infrastructure that works with > and without sparsemem? What is the additional sparsemem overhead still around with this patchset? I thought the sparsemem tables were replaced by the page tables? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org