From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:32:57 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: build error: sparsemem + SLOB In-Reply-To: <20061121191410.GL4797@waste.org> Message-ID: References: <20061120183632.GD4797@waste.org> <20061121143253.51B5.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20061121191410.GL4797@waste.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Matt Mackall Cc: Yasunori Goto , Hugh Dickins , Randy Dunlap , linux-mm@kvack.org, Pekka Enberg List-ID: On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Matt Mackall wrote: > Are there any implications for preemptible kernels here? Matt: Would you mind if I replace SLOB with my new slab design? It is as memory efficient as yours (maybe even more since we do not have the header for each allocation). It can work efficiently in an SMP system (NUMA still under test). The code is more complex though. Still needs to mature. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org