From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:20:13 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC 1/7] Remove declaration of sighand_cachep from slab.h In-Reply-To: <20061118172739.30538d16.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Message-ID: References: <20061118054342.8884.12804.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20061118054347.8884.36259.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20061118172739.30538d16.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Pekka Enberg , Manfred Spraul List-ID: On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Is there no suitable header file to put this in? There is only a single file that uses sighand_cachep apart from where it was defined. If we would add it to signal.h then we would also have to add an include for slab.h just for this statement. I cannot imagine any reason why one would have to use sighand_cachep outside of those two files. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org