From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: virtual memmap sparsity: Dealing with fragmented MAX_ORDER blocks
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:54:10 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609251643150.25159@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609251354460.24262@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Regarding buddy checks out of memmap:
1. This problem only occurs if we allow fragments of MAX_ORDER size
segments. The default needs to be not to allow that. Then we do not
need any checks like right now on IA64. Why would one want smaller
granularity than 2M/4M in hotplugging?
2. If you must have these fragments then we need to check the validity
of the buddy pointers before derefencing them to see if pages can
be combined. If fragments are permitted then a
special function needs to be called to check if the address we are
accessing is legit. Preferably this would be done with an instruction
that can use the MMU to verify if the address is valid
On IA64 this is done with the "probe" instruction
Looking through the i386 commands I see a VERR mnemonic that
I guess will do what you need on i386 and x86_64 in order to do
what we need without a page table walk.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-25 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-24 16:59 virtual mmap basics Christoph Lameter
2006-09-25 12:28 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-09-25 16:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-25 17:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-25 21:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-25 22:22 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-09-25 23:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-26 12:06 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-09-25 18:09 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-09-25 21:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-25 23:54 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2006-09-26 0:31 ` virtual memmap sparsity: Dealing with fragmented MAX_ORDER blocks Christoph Lameter
2006-09-26 12:11 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-09-26 15:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-26 8:16 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0609251643150.25159@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox