linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: virtual memmap sparsity: Dealing with fragmented MAX_ORDER blocks
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:54:10 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609251643150.25159@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609251354460.24262@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

Regarding buddy checks out of memmap:

1. This problem only occurs if we allow fragments of MAX_ORDER size 
   segments. The default needs to be not to allow that. Then we do not 
   need  any checks like right now on IA64. Why would one want smaller
   granularity than 2M/4M in hotplugging?

2. If you must have these fragments then we need to check the validity
   of the buddy pointers before derefencing them to see if pages can
   be combined. If fragments are permitted then a
   special function needs to be called to check if the address we are
   accessing is legit. Preferably this would be done with an instruction
   that can use the MMU to verify if the address is valid 

   On IA64 this is done with the "probe" instruction

   Looking through the i386 commands I see a VERR mnemonic that
   I guess will do what you need on i386 and x86_64 in order to do
   what we need without a page table walk.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-25 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-24 16:59 virtual mmap basics Christoph Lameter
2006-09-25 12:28 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-09-25 16:27   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-25 17:11     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-25 21:05       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-25 22:22         ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-09-25 23:37           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-26 12:06             ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-09-25 18:09     ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-09-25 21:00       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-25 23:54         ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2006-09-26  0:31           ` virtual memmap sparsity: Dealing with fragmented MAX_ORDER blocks Christoph Lameter
2006-09-26 12:11             ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-09-26 15:23               ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-26  8:16           ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0609251643150.25159@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox