From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:26:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction In-Reply-To: <4510D3F4.1040009@yahoo.com.au> Message-ID: References: <1158718568.29000.44.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> <4510D3F4.1040009@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nick Piggin Cc: rohitseth@google.com, CKRM-Tech , devel@openvz.org, linux-kernel , Linux Memory Management List-ID: On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Nick Piggin wrote: > I'm not sure about containers & workload management people, but from > a core mm/ perspective I see no reason why this couldn't get in, > given review and testing. Great! Nack. We already have the ability to manage workloads. We may want to extend the existing functionality but this is duplicating what is already available through cpusets. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org