From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:26:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] GFP_THISNODE for the slab allocator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20060914220011.2be9100a.akpm@osdl.org> <20060914234926.9b58fd77.pj@sgi.com> <20060915002325.bffe27d1.akpm@osdl.org> <20060915004402.88d462ff.pj@sgi.com> <20060915010622.0e3539d2.akpm@osdl.org> <20060917041707.28171868.pj@sgi.com> <20060917060358.ac16babf.pj@sgi.com> <20060917152723.5bb69b82.pj@sgi.com> <20060917192010.cc360ece.pj@sgi.com> <20060918093434.e66b8887.pj@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: David Rientjes Cc: Paul Jackson , akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, David Rientjes wrote: > 1. An increase in N does not lead to degraded performance due to > get_page_from_freelist in any more than a negligible manner. I think that is true if you do not do weird things like creating 64 of those containers on UMA. Or do you anticipate having hundreds of containers? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org