From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:07:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: A solution for more GFP_xx flags? In-Reply-To: <87bqplaiok.wl%peterc@quokka.chubb.wattle.id.au> Message-ID: References: <45061F16.202@yahoo.com.au> <87bqplaiok.wl%peterc@quokka.chubb.wattle.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Peter Chubb Cc: Nick Piggin , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Peter Chubb wrote: > Dunno about you, but the thought of passing structs around on the > stack gives me the heebie jeebies, especially if they're going to be > more than a word or so big. Right. > Either pass by reference, or separate out the args, so it's explicit > how much info's being copied around. Maybe I misunderstood Nick but I did not think he was proposing pushing structs on the stack. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org