From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:16:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [1/3] Add __GFP_THISNODE to avoid fallback to other nodes and ignore cpuset/memory policy restrictions. In-Reply-To: <20060811121540.2253cae7.akpm@osdl.org> Message-ID: References: <20060810124137.6da0fdef.akpm@osdl.org> <20060811110821.51096659.akpm@osdl.org> <20060811114243.49fa4390.akpm@osdl.org> <20060811121540.2253cae7.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, pj@sgi.com, jes@sgi.com, Andy Whitcroft List-ID: On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: > Perhaps there is a downside. But one could argue that NUMA is a > special-case. Let's try it in a couple of places, see how it goes? I'd be glad to use it for future patches. Its certainly useful to deal with conditionals that are only relevant in NUMA situations. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org