From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:33:26 +0100 (IST) From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [1/3] Add __GFP_THISNODE to avoid fallback to other nodes and ignore cpuset/memory policy restrictions. In-Reply-To: <20060808133533.673edc84.pj@sgi.com> Message-ID: References: <20060808104752.3e7052dd.pj@sgi.com> <20060808111855.531e4e29.pj@sgi.com> <20060808133533.673edc84.pj@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Paul Jackson , akpm@osdl.org, Linux Memory Management List , jes@sgi.com, Andy Whitcroft List-ID: On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Paul Jackson wrote: >> Sure. Some examples > > Hmmm ... more than I realized. > > These __GFP_THISNODE patches seem reasonable to me. > I'm happy enough as well. Thanks for taking the time to explain all of the flags potential users. -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org