From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, christoph@lameter.com, mbligh@google.com,
npiggin@suse.de, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: tracking shared dirty pages
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 14:17:24 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606221358100.18020@blonde.wat.veritas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1150976031.15744.122.camel@lappy>
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 22:56 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > + vma->vm_page_prot =
> > > + __pgprot(pte_val
> > > + (pte_wrprotect
> > > + (__pte(pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot)))));
> > > +
> >
> > Is there really no simpler way?
>....
> Awell, thoughts, comments?
Just note vma->vm_page_prot before calling the ->mmap and check after.
If the driver has messed with it at all, it's not a mapping we want to
apply dirty capping to anyway. If it's unchanged, and the other tests
pass, go ahead and reset readonly vm_page_prot via protection_map[].
This is of course a hack, as is the pgprotting code from drm.
The correct solution would be to set the proper backing_dev_info
in a number of drivers - we were too lazy when setting the default
in the first place; but even if we caught all the intree drivers,
we'd miss out-of-tree ones and suffer unnecessary pain from them.
So for now a hack is necessary, and I haven't thought of a better.
Other comments to follow...
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-22 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-19 17:52 [PATCH 0/6] mm: tracking dirty pages -v9 Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-19 17:52 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: tracking shared dirty pages Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-22 5:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-22 6:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-06-22 6:15 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-22 11:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-22 13:17 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2006-06-22 20:52 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-06-22 23:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-22 23:39 ` [PATCH] mm: tracking shared dirty pages -v10 Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-23 3:10 ` Jeff Dike
2006-06-23 3:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-23 3:50 ` Jeff Dike
2006-06-23 4:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-06-23 15:08 ` Jeff Dike
2006-06-23 6:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-23 7:27 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-06-23 17:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-06-23 17:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-23 17:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-06-23 18:11 ` Martin Bligh
2006-06-23 18:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-23 17:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-23 18:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-23 18:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-06-23 18:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 17:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-23 18:05 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-23 18:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2006-06-23 19:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-06-23 22:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-23 22:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-23 22:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-28 14:58 ` [RFC][PATCH] mm: fixup do_wp_page() Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-28 18:20 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-06-19 17:53 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm: balance dirty pages Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-19 17:53 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm: msync() cleanup Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-22 17:02 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-06-19 17:53 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm: optimize the new mprotect() code a bit Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-22 17:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-06-19 17:53 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm: small cleanup of install_page() Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-19 17:53 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm: remove some update_mmu_cache() calls Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-22 16:29 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-06-22 16:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-06-22 17:35 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-06-22 18:31 ` Christoph Lameter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-28 20:17 [PATCH 0/6] mm: tracking dirty pages -v14 Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-28 20:17 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: tracking shared dirty pages Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-13 11:21 [PATCH 0/6] mm: tracking dirty pages -v8 Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-13 11:21 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: tracking shared dirty pages Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0606221358100.18020@blonde.wat.veritas.com \
--to=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=christoph@lameter.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox