linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: Allow migration of mlocked pages
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 16:45:24 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605241640010.16435@blonde.wat.veritas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605240824050.15446@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Wed, 24 May 2006, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> 
> I ran a test program that mlocked an array of pages and then migrated it
> via sys_move_pages() and then verified what happened. Will run some more 
> stress tests today.
> 
> ldso and glibc create some mlocked pages for each binary. If we do 
> migration with MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL (common way of migrating pages) then 
> we usually will have to migrate VM_LOCKED pages of ldso and glibc. So 
> almost any testng of page migration will invariably involve migration of 
> VM_LOCKED pages.

Oh, I'm not worried about whether ordinary VM_LOCKED pages will get
migrated properly, I can't see any problem with that.  It's whether
something somewhere is using mlock and somehow relying on the
physical pages to be pinned.  I don't know what form that "somehow"
would take, and I'm not saying there is or can be any such thing:
just worried that we want wide exposure yet few testers migrate.

Hugh

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-24 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-24  1:15 Christoph Lameter
2006-05-24 15:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-05-24 15:30   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-05-24 15:45     ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2006-05-24 16:09       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-05-24 20:37         ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0605241640010.16435@blonde.wat.veritas.com \
    --to=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox