From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: page_lock_anon_vma(): remove check for mapped page
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:55:02 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602270748280.2419@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0602261558370.13368@goblin.wat.veritas.com>
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Here is the parameterization you wanted. However, I am still not sure
> > that a check for a valid mapping here is sufficient if the caller has no
> > other means to guarantee that the mapping is not vanishing.
> >
> > If the mapping is removed after the check for the mapping was done then
> > we still have a problem.
> >
> > Or is there some way that RCU can preserve the existence of an anonymous
> > vma?
> >
> > Cannot imagine how that would work. If an rcu free was done on the
> > anonymous vma then it may vanish anytime after page_lock_anon_vma does a
> > rcu unlock. And then we are holding a lock that is located in free
> > space......
>
> Please see comments on SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU in mm/slab.c: that's why the
> anon_vma cache is created with that flag, that's why page_lock_anon_vma
> uses rcu_read_lock. Your patch, with more appropriate comments and my
> signoff added, below (but, in case there's any doubt, it's not suitable
> for 2.6.16 - the change itself is simple, but it suddenly makes the
> hitherto untried codepaths of remove_from_swap accessible).
At least my tests show that this codepath is valid and its for new
functionality in 2.6.16. So I guess its suitable for 2.6.16.
I doubt that RCU can help if the anon_vma is removed after the check for
page_mapped. In that case RCU prevents the ultimate free from happening
until rcu_read_unlock. So in essence we lock the anon_vma, return a
pointer to the anonymous vma and then free the anon_vma? Functions calling
page_lock_anon_vma may operate on freed memory due to this race.
Should we not check again for page_mapped after taking the lock?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-27 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-25 1:03 Christoph Lameter
2006-02-25 14:01 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-26 4:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-26 5:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-26 15:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-27 15:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-26 5:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-26 16:07 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-27 15:55 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2006-02-27 16:32 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-27 16:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-27 17:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-27 18:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-27 18:27 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-27 18:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-27 18:43 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0602270748280.2419@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox