From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:19:40 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [PATCH] GFP_THISNODE for the slab allocator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20060914220011.2be9100a.akpm@osdl.org> <20060914234926.9b58fd77.pj@sgi.com> <20060915002325.bffe27d1.akpm@osdl.org> <20060916044847.99802d21.pj@sgi.com> <20060916083825.ba88eee8.akpm@osdl.org> <20060916145117.9b44786d.pj@sgi.com> <20060916161031.4b7c2470.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Andrew Morton , Paul Jackson , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, David Rientjes wrote: > I made a modification in my own tree that allowed numa=fake=N to break the > memory into N nodes that are not powers of 2 (by writing a new hash > function for pfn_to_nid). I booted with numa=fake=3 which gives me one > node of 2G and another of 1G. I then placed each in their own cpusets and > repeated the experiment. > Correction: numa=fake=3 gives me three nodes, each of 1024M. In my experiment I used 0-1 > mems for the usemem cpuset and 2 > mems for the kernel build. David -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org