From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:03:49 -0500 (EST) From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [RFC] Removing page->flags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1139381183.22509.186.camel@localhost> <43E9DBE8.8020900@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Magnus Damm Cc: Nick Piggin , Magnus Damm , linux-mm@kvack.org, Magnus Damm List-ID: On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Magnus Damm wrote: > OTOH, maybe it is more likely that a certain struct page is in the cache > if struct page would become smaller. No. If the struct page is no longer equal to the size of a cache line, most of the struct page structures will end up straddling two cache lines, instead of each being on their own cache line. -- All Rights Reversed -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org