From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:44:07 -0500 (EST) From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch In-Reply-To: <20051231070320.GA9997@dmt.cnet> Message-ID: References: <20051230223952.765.21096.sendpatchset@twins.localnet> <20051230224002.765.28812.sendpatchset@twins.localnet> <20051231070320.GA9997@dmt.cnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , Wu Fengguang , Nick Piggin , Marijn Meijles List-ID: On Sat, 31 Dec 2005, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > Unification of active and inactive per cpu page lists is a requirement > for CLOCK-Pro, right? You can approximate the functionality through use of scan rates. Not quite as accurate as a unified clock, though. -- All Rights Reversed -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org