From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:37:02 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics In-Reply-To: <439619F9.4030905@yahoo.com.au> Message-ID: References: <20051206182843.19188.82045.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <439619F9.4030905@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nick Piggin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen , Marcelo Tosatti List-ID: On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Nick Piggin wrote: > Why not have per-node * per-cpu counters? Yes, that is exactly what this patch implements. > Or even use the current per-zone * per-cpu counters, and work out your > node details from there? I am not aware of any per-zone per cpu counters. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org