From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:08:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: 2.6.14-rc2 early boot OOPS (mm/slab.c:1767) In-Reply-To: <20050928063017.GI1046@vega.lnet.lut.fi> Message-ID: References: <20050927202858.GG1046@vega.lnet.lut.fi> <20050928063017.GI1046@vega.lnet.lut.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Tomi Lapinlampi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, alokk@calsoftinc.com List-ID: On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Tomi Lapinlampi wrote: > > Hmmm. I am not familiar with Alpha. The .config looks as if this is a > > uniprocessor configuration? No NUMA? > > This is a simple uniprocessor configuration, no NUMA, no SMP. > > > What is the value of MAX_NUMNODES? > > I'm not familiar with NUMA, where can I check this (or does this question > even apply since it's not a NUMA system) ? Well, one use of memory nodes is to describe discontiguous memory on some architectures. Thus the number of nodes may be more than one even if CONFIG_NUMA is off. This is the case f.e. on ppc64. There may be some arch specific settings that cause problems here. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org