From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Rusty Lynch <rusty@linux.intel.com>,
"Lynch, Rusty" <rusty.lynch@intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, prasanna@in.ibm.com,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if KPROBES is configured.
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:54:56 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0508301642570.20548@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508310138.09841.ak@suse.de>
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Also with the inline the test should be essentially a single test of
> a global variable and jump. Hardly a big performance issue, no?
There are multiple effects of this code.
- Additional cacheline in use in the page fault handler
increasing the cache foot print.
- There are registers in use for checking the global variable.
- The compilers will reserve registers for the code that is never
executed which may affect other elements of performance. From the
register perspective a function call may be better on ia64.
Certainly not a big effect (if we make sure the compiler knows that
this test mostly fails and insure that the variable is in
__mostly_read) but this is a frequently executed code path and the code
is there without purpose if CONFIG_KPROBES is off.
It wont get too bad unless lots of other people have similar ideas about
fixing their race conditions using similar methods. But we will be setting
a bad precedent if we allow this.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-30 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-30 23:05 Luck, Tony
2005-08-30 23:38 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-30 23:54 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2005-08-31 0:05 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-30 23:56 ` [PATCH] Only process_die notifier in ia64_do_page_fault if KPROBES is configured., " David S. Miller, Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-26 22:46 Rusty Lynch
2005-08-26 23:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-27 0:24 ` [PATCH] " Andi Kleen
2005-08-30 0:19 ` Rusty Lynch
2005-08-30 1:08 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-30 3:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-30 11:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-09-19 18:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-25 20:14 Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.62.0508301642570.20548@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=rusty.lynch@intel.com \
--cc=rusty@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox