linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: pagefault scalability patches
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:19:29 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0508171516570.19035@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050817151723.48c948c7.akpm@osdl.org>

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:

> a) general increase of complexity

The complexity is necesary in order to move to atomic operations that will 
also allow future enhancements.
 
> b) the fact that they only partially address the problem: anonymous page
>    faults are addressed, but lots of other places aren't.

The patches also allow atomic updates of pte flags. The most common 
bottleneck are anonymous faults.

> c) the fact that they address one particular part of one particular
>    workload on exceedingly rare machines.

No this is a general fix for anonymous page faults on SMP machines. As 
noted at the KS, other are seeing similar performance problems.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-17 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-17 22:17 Andrew Morton
2005-08-17 22:19 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2005-08-17 22:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-17 22:51   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-17 23:01     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-17 23:12       ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-17 23:23         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-17 23:31           ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-17 23:30         ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-17 23:33           ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-17 23:44             ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-17 23:52               ` Peter Chubb
2005-08-17 23:58                 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-18  0:47                   ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-18 16:09                     ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-22  2:13     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-18  0:43 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-18 16:04   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-18 20:16   ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-19  1:22     ` [PATCH] use mm_counter macros for nr_pte since its also under ptl Christoph Lameter
2005-08-19  3:17       ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-19  3:51         ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-19  1:33     ` pagefault scalability patches Christoph Lameter
2005-08-19  3:53     ` [RFC] Concept for delayed counter updates in mm_struct Christoph Lameter
2005-08-19  4:29       ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-19  4:34         ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-19  4:49         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-19 16:06           ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-20  7:33           ` [PATCH] mm_struct counter deltas in task_struct Christoph Lameter
2005-08-20  7:35           ` [PATCH] Use deltas to replace atomic inc Christoph Lameter
2005-08-20  7:58             ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-22  3:32               ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-22  3:48                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-22  4:06                   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-22  4:18                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-22 13:23                       ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-22 14:22                         ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-22 15:24                           ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-22 15:43                             ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-22 16:24                               ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-22 20:30                           ` [PATCH] mm_struct counter deltas V2 Christoph Lameter
2005-08-22 20:31                           ` [PATCH] Use deltas to replace atomic inc V2 Christoph Lameter
2005-08-22  2:09   ` pagefault scalability patches Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-08-18  2:00 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-18  8:38   ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-18 16:17     ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-22  2:04       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.62.0508171516570.19035@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox