From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:37:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] gurantee DMA area for alloc_bootmem_low() ver. 2. In-Reply-To: <20050811211419.GB5213@w-mikek2.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20050809194115.C370.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20050809211501.GB6235@w-mikek2.ibm.com> <20050811211419.GB5213@w-mikek2.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Mike Kravetz Cc: Yasunori Goto , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, "Luck, Tony" List-ID: On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Mike Kravetz wrote: > In alphabetical order I first looked at alpha and things didn't look the > same in the '#ifndef USE_48_BIT_KSEG' case. When I first looked at > this, I quit after looking at alpha. However, I can't seem to easily > find other archs that differ. -- Mike Yes, the #ifndef USE_48_BIT_KSEG case is strange. Wonder what is going on there. Should _pa() not do the same? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org