From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 07:58:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: NUMA policy interface In-Reply-To: <20050805091630.GL8266@wotan.suse.de> Message-ID: References: <20050804142942.GY8266@wotan.suse.de> <20050804170803.GB8266@wotan.suse.de> <20050804211445.GE8266@wotan.suse.de> <20050804214132.GF8266@wotan.suse.de> <20050804234025.GJ8266@wotan.suse.de> <20050805091630.GL8266@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andi Kleen Cc: Paul Jackson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > > a clean way. It cannot even deliver the functionality it was designed to > > deliver (see BIND). > > That seems like a unfair description to me. While things are not > perfect they are definitely not as bad as you're trying to paint them. Sorry this went to far in the heat of the discussion. But the BIND functionality is truly not where its supposed to be. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org