From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 12:22:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: RE: [rfc] lockless pagecache In-Reply-To: <200506271905.j5RJ5ag22991@unix-os.sc.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <200506271905.j5RJ5ag22991@unix-os.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Chen, Kenneth W" Cc: 'Badari Pulavarty' , 'Nick Piggin' , Lincoln Dale , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Chen, Kenneth W wrote: > I don't recall seeing tree_lock to be a problem for DSS workload either. I have seen the tree_lock being a problem a number of times with large scale NUMA type workloads. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org