From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 22:21:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: NUMA aware slab allocator V3 In-Reply-To: <4293B292.6010301@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <714210000.1116266915@flay> <200505161410.43382.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> <740100000.1116278461@flay> <1116289613.26955.14.camel@localhost> <428A800D.8050902@us.ibm.com> <428B7B16.10204@us.ibm.com> <428BB05B.6090704@us.ibm.com> <428E3497.3080406@us.ibm.com> <428E56EE.4050400@us.ibm.com> <4293B292.6010301@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Matthew Dobson Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-ID: On Tue, 24 May 2005, Matthew Dobson wrote: > No... It does compile with that trivial patch, though! :) > > -mm2 isn't booting on my 32-way x86 box, nor does it boot on my PPC64 box. > I figured -mm3 would be out shortly and I'd give the boxes another kick in > the pants then... Umm.. How does it fail? Any relationship to the slab allocator? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org