Re: [PATCH/RFC] Shared page tables

[Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>]

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Dave McCracken wrote:
> --On Tuesday, January 24, 2006 17:50:17 +0000 Hugh Dickins
> <hugh@veritas.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Dave McCracken wrote:
> > 
> >> I needed a function that returns a struct page for pgd and pud, defined
> >> in each architecture.  I decided the simplest way was to redefine
> >> pgd_page and pud_page to match pmd_page and pte_page.  Both functions
> >> are pretty much used one place per architecture, so the change is
> >> trivial.  I could come up with new functions instead if you think it's
> >> an issue.  I do have a bit of a fetish about symmetry across levels :)
> > 
> > Sounds to me like you made the right decision.
> 
> I had a thought... would it be preferable for me to make this change as a
> separate patch across all archictures in the name of consistency?  Or

Yes - but don't expect it to be taken if your shared pagetables aren't:
just submit it as the first(ish) patch in your shared pagetables series.

> should I continue to roll it into the shared pagetable patch as we enable
> each architecture?

Hugh

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>