From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:51:48 +0100 (BST) From: Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc4] fix get_user_pages bug In-Reply-To: <20050801131240.4e8b1873.akpm@osdl.org> Message-ID: References: <20050801032258.A465C180EC0@magilla.sf.frob.com> <42EDDB82.1040900@yahoo.com.au> <20050801131240.4e8b1873.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, holt@sgi.com, torvalds@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu, roland@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > static inline int handle_mm_fault(...) > { > int ret = __handle_mm_fault(...); > > if (unlikely(ret == VM_FAULT_RACE)) > ret = VM_FAULT_MINOR; > return ret; > } > because VM_FAULT_RACE is some internal private thing. > It does add another test-n-branch to the pagefault path though. Good idea, at least to avoid changing all arches at this moment; though I don't think handle_mm_fault itself can be static inline. But let's set this VM_FAULT_RACE approach aside for now: I think we're agreed that the pte_dirty-with-mods-to-s390 route is more attractive, so I'll now try to find fault with that approach. Hugh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org