From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 01:40:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] create mm/Kconfig for arch-independent memory options In-Reply-To: <1112821319.14584.28.camel@localhost> Message-ID: References: <42544D7E.1040907@linux-m68k.org> <1112821319.14584.28.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm , Andy Whitcroft List-ID: Hi, On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 22:58 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > > Dave Hansen wrote: > > > --- memhotplug/mm/Kconfig~A6-mm-Kconfig 2005-04-04 09:04:48.000000000 -0700 > > > +++ memhotplug-dave/mm/Kconfig 2005-04-04 10:15:23.000000000 -0700 > > > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ > > > +choice > > > + prompt "Memory model" > > > + default FLATMEM > > > + default SPARSEMEM if ARCH_SPARSEMEM_DEFAULT > > > + default DISCONTIGMEM if ARCH_DISCONTIGMEM_DEFAULT > > > > Does this really have to be a user visible option and can't it be > > derived from other values? The help text entries are really no help at all. > > I hope that this selection will replace the current DISCONTIGMEM prompts > in the individual architectures. That way, you won't get a net increase > in the number of prompts. Why is this choice needed at all? Why would one choose SPARSEMEM over DISCONTIGMEM? Help texts such as "If unsure, choose " make the complete config option pretty useless. bye, Roman -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org