From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:03:27 +0100 (IST) From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Fragmentation Avoidance V17 In-Reply-To: <20051016105346.01c79929.pj@sgi.com> Message-ID: References: <20051011151221.16178.67130.sendpatchset@skynet.csn.ul.ie> <20051015195213.44e0dabb.pj@sgi.com> <20051016105346.01c79929.pj@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Paul Jackson Cc: akpm@osdl.org, jschopp@austin.ibm.com, kravetz@us.ibm.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Memory Management List , lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-ID: On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Paul Jackson wrote: > Mel wrote: > > I would be happy with __GFP_USERRCLM but __GFP_EASYRCLM may be more > > obvious? > > I would be delighted with either one. Yes, __GFP_EASYRCLM is more obvious. > __GFP_EASYRCLM it is then unless someone has an objection. For consistency, RCLM_USER will change to RCLM_EASY as well. Changing one and not the other makes no sense to me. > -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Java Applications Developer University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org