From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 04:37:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: NUMA aware slab allocator V2 In-Reply-To: <20050513043311.7961e694.akpm@osdl.org> Message-ID: References: <20050512000444.641f44a9.akpm@osdl.org> <20050513000648.7d341710.akpm@osdl.org> <20050513043311.7961e694.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shai@scalex86.org, steiner@sgi.com List-ID: On Fri, 13 May 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > > The definition for the number of NUMA nodes is dependent on > > CONFIG_FLATMEM instead of CONFIG_NUMA in mm. > > CONFIG_FLATMEM is not set on ppc64 because CONFIG_DISCONTIG is set! And > > consequently nodes exist in a non NUMA config. > > I was testing 2.6.12-rc4 base. There we still have the notion of nodes depending on CONFIG_DISCONTIG and not on CONFIG_NUMA. The node stuff needs to be #ifdef CONFIG_FLATMEM or #ifdef CONFIG_DISCONTIG ?? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org