linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: AIM9 slowdowns between 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc1
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:37:36 +0100 (IST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504031532570.25594@skynet> (raw)

While testing the page placement policy patches on 2.6.12-rc1, I noticed
that aim9 is showing significant slowdowns on page allocation-related
tests. An excerpt of the results is at the end of this mail but it shows
that page_test is allocating 18000 less pages.

I did not check who has been recently changing the buddy allocator but
they might want to run a benchmark or two to make sure this is not
something specific to my setup.

root@monocle:~# grep _test vmregressbench-2.6.11-standard/aim9/log.txt
     7 page_test           60.01       4420   73.65439       125212.46 System Allocations & Pages/second
     8 brk_test            60.00       1732   28.86667       490733.33 System Memory Allocations/second
     9 jmp_test            60.01     252898 4214.26429      4214264.29 Non-local gotos/second
    10 signal_test         60.00       5983   99.71667        99716.67 Signal Traps/second
    11 exec_test           60.01        788   13.13114           65.66 Program Loads/second
    12 fork_test           60.06        986   16.41692         1641.69 Task Creations/second
    13 link_test           60.00       6302  105.03333         6617.10 Link/Unlink Pairs/second
root@monocle:~# grep _test vmregressbench-2.6.12-rc1-standard/aim9/log.txt
     7 page_test           60.01       3784   63.05616       107195.47 System Allocations & Pages/second
     8 brk_test            60.02       1194   19.89337       338187.27 System Memory Allocations/second
     9 jmp_test            60.00     252312 4205.20000      4205200.00 Non-local gotos/second
    10 signal_test         60.00       3731   62.18333        62183.33 Signal Traps/second
    11 exec_test           60.08        762   12.68309           63.42 Program Loads/second
    12 fork_test           60.04        864   14.39041         1439.04 Task Creations/second
    13 link_test           60.01       4723   78.70355         4958.32 Link/Unlink Pairs/second

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Java Applications Developer
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2005-04-03 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-03 14:37 Mel Gorman [this message]
2005-04-03 19:06 ` Dave Hansen
2005-04-03 20:05   ` AIM9 slowdowns between 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc1 (probably false positive) Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0504031532570.25594@skynet \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox