From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:12:15 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo Subject: Re: 2.6.3-rc3-mm1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Bill Davidsen Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > I think it was a good change, and was appropriate to 2.5.x. But for 2.6.x > > the benefit didn't seem to justify the depth of the change. Rather unfortunate that allyes didn't fix things. > And will it be appropriate for 2.7? It really does give a start to > trimming code you don't want in a small kernel, and would have been nice > so people could use it for any processor specific additions to 2.6. > > Not arguing, but it was a step to improve control of creeping unnecessary > archetecture support. Well the -tiny tree has that and a lot more drastic trimmings, Andrew is there already an arrangement to feed the not so brutal changes to you? Zwane -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org