From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx157.postini.com [74.125.245.157]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E8F96B0002 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:12:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:12:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: EHCI: fix for leaking isochronous data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Soeren Moch Cc: Arnd Bergmann , USB list , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , linux-mm@kvack.org, Kernel development list , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, michael@amarulasolutions.com On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Soeren Moch wrote: > > > Now I found out what is going on here: > > > > In itd_urb_transaction() we allocate 9 iTDs for each URB with > > number_of_packets == 64 in my case. The iTDs are added to > > sched->td_list. For a frame-aligned scheduling we need 8 iTDs, the 9th > > one is released back to the front of the streams free_list in > > iso_sched_free(). This iTD was cleared after allocation and has a frame > > number of 0 now. So for each allocation when now_frame == 0 we allocate > > from the dma_pool, not from the free_list. > > Okay, that is a problem. But it shouldn't be such a big problem, > because now_frame should not be equal to 0 very often. Oh, wait, now I get it. We never reach a steady state, because the free list never shrinks, but occasionally it does increase when now_frame is equal to 0. Even though that doesn't happen very often, the effects add up. Very good; tomorrow I will send your patch in. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org